02-28-2016, 09:48 PM
Morcey, It should be about navigable waters, I do agree with that.
The beds of navigable rivers are public property up to the ordinary high water mark, and adjoining private property owners may not interfere with the public’s right to use the river corridor for lawful recreational purposes. These rights on navigable rivers are some of the oldest recognized rights in American Law.
Judge Pulling's ruling was way over reaching. Not even a tenth of the 2700 miles of streams in Utah have any history of being navigable.
He messed up just like the Utah Legislators did 5 years ago by blocking access to those few miles of water ways in Utah that are navigable.
[signature]
The beds of navigable rivers are public property up to the ordinary high water mark, and adjoining private property owners may not interfere with the public’s right to use the river corridor for lawful recreational purposes. These rights on navigable rivers are some of the oldest recognized rights in American Law.
Judge Pulling's ruling was way over reaching. Not even a tenth of the 2700 miles of streams in Utah have any history of being navigable.
He messed up just like the Utah Legislators did 5 years ago by blocking access to those few miles of water ways in Utah that are navigable.
[signature]